Monday, 10 August 2015

A Return to the Parrish Art Museum

At the end of 2012 I visited the Parrish Art Museum shortly after the grand opening of the Long Island institution's Herzog & de Meuron building, writing a weekly dose on it in early 2013. Over the weekend I finally returned, specifically to see the Tara Donovan Slinky sculptures. Those sculptures were decent, kind of worth the trip, but I was more impressed by how in just a over a couple years the building has integrated itself into the landscapes designed by Reed Hilderbrand Associates. So below are a few 2012/2015 photos comparisons (keep in mind that the views are not exact matches, but they are fairly close).

Southern roadside elevation in 2012:
Parrish Art Museum

Southern roadside elevation (with Roy Lichtenstein sculptures) in 2015:
Parrish Art Museum

Left is bioswale at parking lot in 2012 and right is bioswale in 2015:
Parrish Art MuseumParrish Art Museum

Approach to the museum from parking on the north in 2012:
Parrish Art Museum

Approach to the museum from parking on the north in 2015:
Parrish Art Museum

North elevation in 2012:
Parrish Art Museum

North elevation in 2015:
Parrish Art Museum

The southern elevation in 2012:
Parrish Art Museum

The southern elevation in 2015:
Parrish Art Museum

Today's archidose #855

Here are some photos of the Philharmonic Hall (2014) in Szczecin, Poland, by Estudio Barozzi Veiga, photographed by Maciek Lulko. The building won the 2015 Mies van der Rohe Award, European Union Prize for Contemporary Architecture.

Szczecin Philharmonic Hall

Szczecin Philharmonic Hall

Szczecin Philharmonic Hall

Szczecin Philharmonic Hall

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:
:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool
To contribute your Instagram images for consideration, just:
:: Tag your photos #archidose

Wednesday, 5 August 2015

Today's archidose #854

Here are some photos of POLIN Museum of the History of Polish Jews (2013) in Warsaw, Poland, by Lahdelma & Mahlamäki Architects, photographed by Ziemowit Cabanek.

POLIN (Muzeum Historii Żydów Polskich)

POLIN (Muzeum Historii Żydów Polskich)

POLIN (Muzeum Historii Żydów Polskich)

POLIN (Muzeum Historii Żydów Polskich)

POLIN (Muzeum Historii Żydów Polskich)

POLIN (Muzeum Historii Żydów Polskich)

POLIN (Muzeum Historii Żydów Polskich)

POLIN (Muzeum Historii Żydów Polskich)

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:
:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool
To contribute your Instagram images for consideration, just:
:: Tag your photos #archidose

Monday, 3 August 2015

AIA Chicago's Lifetime Achievement Awards

Today AIA Chicago announced that Richard H. Driehaus is the recipient of the 2015 Lifetime Achievement Award. While I'm not too excited about one of the driving forces of neoclassical architecture getting an award from an AIA chapter in one of the most modern American cities (where Driehaus and his foundation resides), the award made me curious about the previous recipients. How does he compare to others? Although I immediately recall that Stanley Tigerman and John Vinci recently receiving the honor, it's surprising just how difficult it is to find a list of AIA Chicago's Lifetime Achievement Awards, which started in 2006. Basically AIA Chicago doesn't have one. So I did a little digging and put the list of winners from this and past years below (hopefully I got them all correct). Videos about the winners are supplied when available.

2015: Richard H. Driehaus


2014: John Vinci


2013: Stanley Tigerman


2012: Helmut Jahn


2011: Ben Weese

2010: Natalie de Blois


2009: Daniel Burnham and Edward Bennett (jointly and posthumously on the 100th anniversary of their Plan of Chicago)

2008: Gertude Lempp Kerbis


2007: John A. Holabird Jr.


2006: Walter Netsch

Friday, 31 July 2015

Today's archidose #853

Here are some photos of Quinta de Lemos in Viseu, Portugal, by Carvalho Araújo Arquitectos, photographed by José Carlos Melo Dias.

Passos do Silgueiros, Quinta de Lemos, Carvalho Araujo

Passos do Silgueiros, Quinta de Lemos. Carvalho Araujo

Passos do Silgueiros, Quinta de Lemos. Carvalho Araujo

Passos do Silgueiros, Quinta de Lemos, Carvalho Araujo

Passos do Silgueiros, Quinta de Lemos. Carvalho Araujo

Passos do Silgueiros, Quinta de Lemos. Carvalho Araujo

Passos do Silgueiros, Quinta de Lemos. Carvalho Araujo

Passos do Silgueiros, Quinta de Lemos. Carvalho Araujo

Passos do Silgueiros, Quinta de Lemos. Carvalho Araujo

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:
:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool
To contribute your Instagram images for consideration, just:
:: Tag your photos #archidose

Thursday, 30 July 2015

Going SUMO


[All photos courtesy of deMx architecture's Facebook page, unless noted otherwise]

I just learned about SUMO (Sustainabile Urban MObility), an "electric, mechanized mobility service [that] is the Western Hemisphere's first car sharing service based on street-legal, low-speed electric vehicles (LEVs), thus one of the greenest forms of motorized mobility in the world," per their website. Appropriately, their new headquarters is located in a shipping container stuffed into the porte cochère of an old building in Fayetteville, Arkansas.



Specifically, the SUMO headquarters is located at West and Lafayette streets:

[Image courtesy of Google Maps]

Here is a photo of the building before it received the shipping container:


The project was designed by SUMO founders Bob Munger and Mikel Lolley with the assistance of Fayetteville's deMx architecture, which posted these photos to their Facebook page. It's one of the more creative uses of shipping containers I've seen in recent years, and it goes hand in hand with the mission of SUMO.

Wednesday, 29 July 2015

Book Review: OfficeUS Atlas

OfficeUS Atlas edited by Eva Franch i Gilabert, Ana Miljački, Ashley Schafer, Michael Kubo
Storefront for Art and Architecture, Lars Müller Publishers, 2015
Hardcover, 1,250 pages



The 2014 Venice Architecture Biennale was one of the most anticipated since it started in the 1970s. Rem Koolhaas served as director and he aimed to unify the various national pavilions under one theme: "Absorbing Modernity 1914-2014." In most years the national pavilions do their own thing, often exhibiting the work of native architects; that is already the case with 2016 for the United States, which decided to focus on Detroit even before Alejandro Aravena was named director. But Koolhaas demanded more time and got it so he could leverage a bit more control and make the Biennale a bit more unified. For the most part it worked, with for the most part each country covering 100 years of architectural production. For the U.S. Pavilion, curated by Eva Franch i Gilabert, Ana Miljački, and Ashley Schafer, the theme was OfficeUS, which focused on American firms building overseas.



The U.S. Pavilion was the equivalent of information overload, since just about every wall of the "U"-shape building in the Giardini was covered with papers on American architects that the curators researched. These architects ranged from the obvious, like SOM and KPF, to smaller firms that would seem to be less likely to build overseas. But given the time frame covered in the exhibition, OfficeUS followed a number of changes in overseas, or imperial, architectural production. What was a rarity 100 years ago is now common practice, given the ease of telecommunications, travel and collaboration.



OfficeUS Atlas follows OfficeUS Agenda, which was published as a catalog to accompany the exhibition. It is much slimmer (only 272 pages) and more theoretical, since it "frames the narratives that have projected the organizational structures and branded identity of U.S. architecture firms internationally from 1914 - 2014." OfficeUS Atlas, on the other hand, is a gargantuan book on par with the exhibition itself. Thankfully it is not the book equivalent of the exhibition's information overload, since the design and layout help to break up the book into more manageable chunks and make it easy to navigate. The book works in a chronological order with content divided between archive materials (articles from magazines mainly) and profiles of firms building overseas; the former has pages with black edges and the latter has white pages, resulting in a book with black-and-white stripes. The order of the book makes the changing conditions of overseas work obvious, while it also (inadvertently?) shows how architectural publishing changed over the same period. Not only are some magazines long gone, but the content has changed from more big-picture and critical stories to project-specific coverage.

The combination of archive material and firm bios (with many projects illustrated with postage stamp-sized images) make this book appealing from different angles. Unfortunately, for those interested in the book as an archive the design falters. Although a black border is given around each clipped article (partially visible in the other two images above), there is no matching border in the fold. In many cases this does not affect the readability of the old articles (it should be noted these are smaller than their original page sizes, but they are still big enough to be read easily), but in far too many cases the text and/or drawings gets lost in the fold. Not allowing a margin in the fold is an inexcusable but common occurrence in architecture publishing. I've learned to overlook it at times, but I expect more from Lars Müller, who published this book and is known for thoughtful design in his books. Perhaps there was a sense on the part of the editors/curators that the archives were there for effect, to show how much and what has been written about the theme they developed. But far too often I found myself sucked into an old article only to turn the page and be frustrated by lost words – one blemish on an otherwise excellent book and record of an ambitious exhibition.